In a World Class Manufacturing one of the metrics of high impact is the OEE and it is the main metric to improve at TPM deployment and obviously all the actions must start at Genba with the Teamwork effort.
OEE is essentially the ratio
of Fully Productive Time to Planned Production Time. In practice, OEE is
calculated as the product of its 3 contributing factors
OEE =
Availability x Performance x Quality
This type of calculation
makes OEE a severe test. For example, when all 3 factors are at 90%, OEE would
be 72.9%. The following table shows generally accepted World Class goals for
each factor.
Fig.
Worldwide studies show that
the average OEE rate in manufacturing plants is 60%
OEE analysis starts with Plant Operating Time;
the amount of time your facility is open and available for equipment operation.
From Plant Operating Time, you subtract a
category of time called Planned Shut Down, which
includes all events that should be excluded from efficiency analysis because there was no intention
of running production (e.g. breaks, lunch, scheduled maintenance,
or periods where there is nothing to produce). The remaining available
time is your Planned
Production Time.
OEE begins with Planned Production Time and
scrutinizes efficiency and productivity losses that occur, with the goal of
reducing or eliminating these losses. There are three general categories of loss to
consider - Down Time Loss, Speed Loss and
Quality Loss.
Availability takes into
account Down Time Loss, which includes any events that stop planned production for an appreciable
length of time(usually several minutes - long enough to log as a
trackable Event).
Examples include equipment failures, material
shortages, and changeover time. Changeover time is included in OEE
analysis, since it is a form of down time. While it may not be possible to
eliminate changeover time, in most cases it can be reduced. The
remaining available time is called Operating Time.
Performance takes into
account Speed Loss, which includes any factors that cause the process to operate at less than
the maximum possible speed, when running. Examples include machine
wear,substandard materials, misfeeds, and operator
inefficiency. The
remaining available time is called Net Operating
Time.
Quality takes into account Quality
Loss, which accounts for produced pieces that do not meet quality standards, including
pieces that require rework. The remaining time is called Fully Productive
Time. Our goal is to maximize Fully Productive Time.
The right approach to have a good results on OEE is
basically focus the Kaizen events on reduce the 6 big losses.The main metrics for the team will be expressed on how
capable they are on eliminate or reduce the 6 big losses.
Fig.
As we can see , the OEE is a result , of Availability , Performance ,
and Quality however those 3 are result of 6 Big Losses.
Addressing the Six Big Losses
Now that we know what the Six Big Losses are and some
of the events that contribute to these losses, we can focus on ways to monitor
and correct them. Categorizing data makes loss analysis much easier, and a key
goal should be fast and efficient data collection, with data put to use
throughout the day and in real-time.
Breakdowns
Eliminating unplanned Down Time is critical to
improving OEE.
Other OEE be addressed if the process is down. It is
not only important to know how much Down Time your process is experiencing (and
when) but also to be able to attribute the lost time to the specific source or
reason for the loss (tabulated through Reason Codes). With Down Time and
Reason Code data tabulated, Root Cause Analysis is applied starting with
the most severe loss categories.
Setup and Adjustments
Setup and Adjustment time is generally measured as the
time between the last good part produced before Setup to the first consistent
good parts produced after Setup. This often includes substantial adjustment
and/or warm-up time in order to consistently produce parts that meet quality
standards.
Tracking Setup Time is critical to reducing
this loss, together with an active program to reduce this time (SMES or OTED program).
Many companies use creative methods of reducing Setup
Time including assembling changeover carts with all tools and supplies
necessary for the changeover in one place, pinned or marked settings so that coarse
adjustments are no longer necessary, and use of prefabricated setup gauges.
Small Stops and Reduced Speed
Small Stops and Reduced Speed are the most difficult
of the Six Big Losses to monitor and record. Cycle Time Analysis should
be utilized to pinpoint these loss types. In most processes recording data for
Cycle Time Analysis needs to be automated since cycles are quick and repetitive
events that do not leave adequate time for manual data-logging.
By comparing all completed cycles to the Ideal Cycle
Time and filtering the data through a
Small Stop Threshold and Reduce
Speed the errant cycles can be automatically categorized for analysis. The
reason for analyzing Small Stops separately from Reduced Speed is that the root
causes are typically very different, as can be seen from the Event Examples in
the previous table.
Startup Rejects and Production Rejects
Startup Rejects and Production Rejects are
differentiated, since often the root causes are different between startup and
steady-state production. Parts that require rework of any kind should be
considered rejects. Tracking when rejects occur during a shift and/or job run
can help pinpoint potential causes, and in many cases patterns will be
discovered.
Team in action:
Team in action:
No hay comentarios.:
Publicar un comentario